All though matching in a core facilities to a Brother HL-3075CW ($300 street), a Brother HL-3045CN ($270 street) offers radically a same multiple of quick speed, excusable if unimpressive outlay quality, and paper doing suitable for a micro, small, or home office. It’s also reduction costly than a nearby twin, that helps make it a good choice. However, it leaves out some extras you’ll wish to make certain we won’t need, given that we can get them with a HL-3075CW for customarily a tiny additional cost.
The dual printers are built around a same LED engine. (LED printers work a same approach as lasers, solely that they use LEDs rather than a laser to pull a picture of any page on a drum before printing.) Having a same engine gives them a same tender speed, during a rated 19 pages per notation (ppm) for both tone and monochrome output.
Sharing a same engine also gives them a same paper handling, with a 250-sheet tray, that should be plenty for many tiny offices, and a 1-sheet primer feed, so we can switch to a opposite kind of paper for a given imitation pursuit though carrying to change a paper in a tray. In both cases also, Brother doesn’t sell any additional paper doing options, so if we need involuntary duplexing for copy on both sides of a page, or we need a aloft capacity, conjunction will be a right printer for you.
Probably a many apparent underline a HL-3045CN lacks that a nearby twin has is WiFi support. It also lacks a built-in printer language, that means your mechanism has to rasterize any page rather than handing a pursuit over to a printer. (The HL-3075CW supports both PCL6 and BR-Script3, Brother’s PostScript clone.) This isn’t customarily an issue, though there are still some applications that work improved with a given printer denunciation than with a host-based printer. For desktop publishing, for example, you’re generally improved off with a printer that includes PostScript.
Also distinct a HL-3075CW, a HL-3045CN can’t imitation from PictBridge cameras or USB memory keys. Both capabilities could come in accessible in, say, a genuine estate bureau that needs to imitation photos easily. However both are also customarily some-more critical for home than business use, so many offices can simply do though them.
Setup and Speed
As it’s built around a same engine as a HL-3075CW, a HL-3045CN also has a same distance and weight. At 9.8 by 16.1 by 18.3 inches (HWD) it’s comparatively easy to find room for, and tiny adequate so we can put it on your table though it soaring over you. Given a 41.9-pound weight, however, we competence wish some assistance relocating it into place.
I connected a printer to a network and ran a tests from a Windows Vista system. Setup was positively typical. The formula were not. On a business applications suite, we timed a HL-3045CN during an effective 6 ppm (using QualityLogic’s hardware and program for timing). That creates it effectively tied with a HL-3075CW, with both printers faster than anything else in their cost class. The Editors’ Choice Dell 1350cnw Color LED Printer ($299 direct, 4 stars), for example, came in during 4.9 ppm. Both were also faster than a many some-more costly Editors’ Choice Dell 2150cdn ($399.99, 4.0 stars), during 5.5 ppm.
The HL-3045CN’s outlay peculiarity is good adequate for many business use, though not a clever point. In fact, it’s a hold next standard for text, graphics, and photos.
Being somewhat next standard for content isn’t many of an emanate in genuine universe use, since standard content peculiarity for lasers is so high. Unless we have an surprising need for tiny fonts or we need a printer for high peculiarity desktop publishing, we should be ideally happy with a content output.
Our graphics tests, unfortunately, showed some genuine problems, with teenager banding, disproportionate fills for vast areas of black background, and a ubiquitous clarity on many of a exam samples of murky colors—or dim tone in terms of a hue-saturation-brightness tone model. Overall, a graphics are good adequate for any inner business use. Depending on your spin of perfectionism, we competence cruise them good adequate for, say, PowerPoint handouts. However, I’d demur to palm them to an critical patron or patron we was perplexing to stir with my professionalism.
Photos were also good adequate for many business use. The printer can spin out tangible tone photos from a Web page, for example. On a other hand, a photos were also grainy and showed apparent shifts in color. Depending on how many of a captious we are, once again, we competence or competence not cruise them good adequate for patron newsletters or a like.
As with a HL-3075CW, finally, unless high-quality outlay is your categorical concern, a Brother HL-3045CN’s quick speed and good paper doing make it a good fit for a tiny or micro office. If there’s any possibility we competence need one of a additional facilities a HL-3075CW offers, it’s value profitable a tiny additional volume to get them. But if you’ve narrowed your choices down to these two, and you’re certain we won’t skip a extras, we can save a small income by removing a Brother HL-3045CN instead.
More Laser Printer Reviews: